The best online Debate website - DebateIsland.com! The only Online Debate Website with Casual, Persuade Me, Formalish, and Formal Online Debate formats. We’re the Leading Online Debate website. Debate popular topics, Debate news, or Debate anything! Debate online for free!
Where do you get your morals from?
in Philosophy
Debra AI Prediction
Arguments
Each of us as living creatures study and learn and then hold what we learned up to the test of is that really right or not? A modern Muslim man may read Koran verses about killing infidels and then face a choice - take it at face value unquestioned, or think about it as a living sentient being and come to his own conclusion it is not morally right to kill a stranger just because they aren't Muslim. We each face these individual choices all our lives. The wise person knows to weigh them all and make the best decision on their own. The fool is the person who declares "that's what it says" and then cuts someone's head off because of it.
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.38  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 90%  
  Learn More About Debra
The evolution of a moral code of conduct is a function of the “Golden Rule” driven by a “universal morality,” through the interaction of life’s “unalienable Rights,” which is an outgrowth of the physical constructal law.
  Considerate: 99%  
  Substantial: 64%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.9  
  Sources: 4  
  Relevant (Beta): 78%  
  Learn More About Debra
Morality is the product of an innumerable amount of factors leading up to the way you exist in the present.
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 47%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.34  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 70%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.74  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 60%  
  Learn More About Debra
I would question; is how we respond to events a conscious decision or a sub-conscious decision?
Are we actually in control of our minds and bodies, or are our minds and bodies actually in control of us?
  Considerate: 87%  
  Substantial: 97%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.16  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
However, I also have a certain hierarchy in my mind. For example, my personal happiness is more important than that of anyone else, and whatever I do, first, is supposed to serve my interest. For example, when I do charity, I recognize that I do it because it makes me feel good - this is the honesty of my character I have always been proud of.
After me go my closest friends. Then relatives. Then acquaintances. Then random people on the street. And so on down the ladder.
  Considerate: 95%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.38  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 54%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 78%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.98  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 48%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 99%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.38  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
The basis for morality is empathy, which is basically the capacity to relate to other people, share their feelings and to care for them.
Empathy is the result of human evolution and natural selection, as along with our high intelligence and tool using ability it enabled us to work together in social groups in a way that was to the benefit of all within that group.
Working together as a group gave us an advantage that an individual wouldn’t have. As a group we were able to hunt far more effectively, taking on and killing large game, even something the size of a mammoth, it also enabled us to compete with and defend ourselves against big heavily armed predators.
We ended up at the top of the food chain, a good place to be in the survival stakes.
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 97%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 88%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 69%  
  Substantial: 29%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 2.7  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 59%  
  Learn More About Debra
I aim to act morally and know why the law is the law. This is the inverse mentality of aiming to act legally and know why my morals are right.
I found myself to be a toxic troll online and disgusting person IRL following the latter mentality.
Worry less about the why and more about the what. If your inner moral compass says nothing is wrong, then you need to emotionally alter yourself by interaction with animals and humans. Eye contact is important to see them as real sentient beings etc.
  Considerate: 50%  
  Substantial: 79%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.04  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 53%  
  Substantial: 92%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.94  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
I don't think that this should be taught to people, however, because it can lead to the mentality of "that person will not benefit me, so I ought not to do good to him/her", even though through doing bad things to that individual you are going to be disliked by people who like that individual, and possibly put up a reputation which might not be beneficial for you.
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.54  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 30%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.78  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 60%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 21%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
@someone234
one could also ask which came first, morality we made into law, codified as law and the standard by which all should live. The religious law did the same thing as people were acting morally before it. Now, how, where and why it came to be, it's difficult to say with any certainty as there are many plausible theories. Only humans have morality as we define it and in the scope that it is in our lives.
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 95%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.66  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 88%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.82  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
@someone234
it was rhetorical question
I answered my own question.
but if you examine the Original question it applies, which came first? Which ever is first means everything subsequent is predicated on the first wouldn't it? And therefore your morality is actually begotten by the first ultimately.
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.98  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 82%  
  Substantial: 37%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.42  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 17%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 3.02  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 72%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 79%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.02  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 88%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 82%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.86  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
We don't not tariff imports or exports because it's morally right to do so.
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 93%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.64  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
Completely incorrect? Wow dishonest much? Explain how finding murder morally wrong is based on law rather than the morality gave rise to the law. Which came first deciding murder was wrong or laws saying it was?
regardless of the pedantic details, which came first and which one was the basis for the other's existence (law and morality)
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 63%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.5  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
@DrCereal
correct what he said (economic strategy etc) had nothing to do with morality so it's off topic and irrelevant (tariffs)
the question was
"Where do you get your morals from?"
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 53%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.04  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 68%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 87%  
  Substantial: 74%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 79%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.3  
  Sources: 3  
  Relevant (Beta): 81%  
  Learn More About Debra
Actually, economic freedom is a moral issue, which means you imposing some strategy on it is immoral.
  Considerate: 74%  
  Substantial: 60%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.04  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 72%  
  Learn More About Debra
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 62%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 82%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.54  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 60%  
  Learn More About Debra
Policies should be dictated based on how well they respond to the objective world around us, and it so happens that free trade leads to a much better outcome (meaning higher degree of happiness) for everyone than protectionism, hence it should be promoted.
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 99%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
@MayCaesar
sure but the concept, the origination is in morality isn't it? what is fair in other words. why can't you charge 50% interest on a loan legally? Because it's not fair. Same is true with tariffs. you can only charge what the other country allows aka think is fair or willing to tolerate as fair. and when they argue the amounts charged, what is the #1 criticism, that it's not fair. Again trade and bartering was all based on the subjective of what was fair, rooted in morality.
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.78  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 77%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 93%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.08  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
I do not think fairness has much to do with it. On a true free market, you absolutely can charge 50% interest - it is another matter that few people will agree to take such a loan, and your business plan will probably fail if you try to make it an integral part of your company.
I see it differently. Two people, one from Mexico and another from Japan, want to trade. One has 10 apples, another has 10 pears. They meet together, say, in Mexico City to perform an exchange. A Mexican bureaucrat comes over and says, "You should share your profits with the government" - and takes a toll of 2 apples and 2 pears. Both merchants are unhappy with the deal and feel robbed (because they were).
It is the individual happiness that leads to the concept of individual freedom. I suppose you could say that a respective moral system is also built on that concept - but, in my opinion, in general a moral system should dictate what you "should" do, not what you "must" do. There is a difference.
When I "should" share my wealth with others and I feel like I should do it, then I'll probably do it on my own - or maybe I will not, if I do not value this moral stance this much. When I "must" share it, however, then I have no choice, because not sharing it will lead to negative physical consequences for me.
So, I would separate morals from objective considerations. Enforcing morals by law is how any dictatorship starts.
  Considerate: 87%  
  Substantial: 92%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.54  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
@MayCaesar
The government takes it's tax and then either redistributes it (entitlements/moral) or is used in some other way for the greater good, again morality. We aren't talking about enforcement but rather the genesis of laws, the precursor to laws is morality, and perhaps Occam's razor is best way to explain.
Are laws meant to be just/justice, if so what determines that they are just is morality/fairness.
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 87%  
  Substantial: 92%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.6  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
punishment is a moral decision/judgment. But again you can't truly get your morals from the legal system when the whole concept of law arose from agreed morality. I'll admit there could be some law not based, influenced or created from/because of morality, I can't think of any examples atm.
I believe laws are a direct result and could not have happened w/o morality. Therefore if you believe your morality comes from "the legal system" this is incorrect as the legal system came from morality.
Oh Lord, please don't let me be misunderstood"
The Animals
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.42  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 90%  
  Learn More About Debra
Morality is subjective, and the clashes of different moral systems is the reason so many policies are so heavily debated, since people think their moral stance must develop the law.
For example, take the matter of universal basic income (UBI). Proponents can say that UBI is needed, because it is immoral to let people starve when you can help them. Opponents can say that UBI should not exist, because it is immoral to take resources away from people without their consent.
I think that both points miss the mark. What should be asked instead is this: "Which approach leads to ahigher quality of life in the state?" Now, how exactly quality of life should be quantified is up to the debate - but the general point is that we focus on practical considerations and on the outcome, not on an abstract system that dictates what is "right" and what is "wrong".
Think of it as cursing: cursing is considered bad in general, but it is not restricted, it is just discouraged by the societal culture. I can say the F word with no repercussion. It is deemed that people free to say the F word, even if they do not say it, are happier than people who are not free to say the F word. In general, freedom is found to highly correlate with happiness: the more things people are free to do, the more venues they have to satisfy their needs and desires.
From this concept of freedom, policies are born: "Which policies maximize the personal freedom of each individual?" This is my approach to policing, at any rate, and I think it is the most practical one.
---
Unlike the laws, I see morals as more of a display of personal values. The difference between a moral and a law, in my view, is this: if it is immoral to verbally assault people, I will not do so, but I will not expect those who do to be punished - and if it is illegal, then punishment is in order.
Laws definitely may somehow be based on morals (especially if certain morals in the society are so pervasive, even one person acting against them will disrupt the social order) - but I think that this is just a correlation: morals and laws are different entities stemming from the same origin - the need for happiness.
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.12  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra